TY - JOUR KW - PROM KW - Measuring outcomes KW - Mental Health KW - Mixed methods KW - Quality of Life KW - Recovery AU - Keetharuth AD AU - Taylor Buck E AU - Acquadro C AU - Conway K AU - Connell J AU - Barkham M AU - Carlton J AU - Ricketts T AU - Barber R AU - Brazier J AB -
While it is important to treat symptoms, there is growing recognition that in order to help people with mental health problems lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, it is crucial to capture the impact of their conditions on wider aspects of their social lives. We constructed two versions of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measure—ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20—for use in routine settings and clinical trials from a larger pool of items by combining qualitative and quantitative evidence covering six domains. Qualitative evidence was gathered through interviews and focus groups with over 76 service users, clinicians, and a translatability assessment. Psychometric evidence generated from data from over 6200 service users was obtained from confirmatory factor models and item response theory analyses. In this paper we present an approach based on a traffic light pictorial format that was developed to present qualitative and quantitative evidence to a group of service users, clinicians, and researchers to help to make the final selection. This work provides a pragmatic yet rigorous approach to combining qualitative and quantitative evidence to ensure that ReQoL is psychometrically robust and has high relevance to service users and clinicians. This approach can be extended to the development of patient reported outcome measures in general.
BT - International journal of environmental research and public health C1 -http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949892?dopt=Abstract
DO - 10.3390/ijerph15071342 IS - 7 J2 - Int J Environ Res Public Health LA - eng N2 -While it is important to treat symptoms, there is growing recognition that in order to help people with mental health problems lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, it is crucial to capture the impact of their conditions on wider aspects of their social lives. We constructed two versions of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measure—ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20—for use in routine settings and clinical trials from a larger pool of items by combining qualitative and quantitative evidence covering six domains. Qualitative evidence was gathered through interviews and focus groups with over 76 service users, clinicians, and a translatability assessment. Psychometric evidence generated from data from over 6200 service users was obtained from confirmatory factor models and item response theory analyses. In this paper we present an approach based on a traffic light pictorial format that was developed to present qualitative and quantitative evidence to a group of service users, clinicians, and researchers to help to make the final selection. This work provides a pragmatic yet rigorous approach to combining qualitative and quantitative evidence to ensure that ReQoL is psychometrically robust and has high relevance to service users and clinicians. This approach can be extended to the development of patient reported outcome measures in general.
PY - 2018 T2 - International journal of environmental research and public health TI - Integrating qualitative and quantitative data in the development of outcome measures: The case of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures in mental health populations. UR - http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1342/pdf VL - 15 SN - 1660-4601 ER -