03752nas a2200457 4500000000100000008004100001260001200042100001700054700001400071700001500085700001600100700001300116700001500129700001500144700001400159700001500173700001500188700001200203700001300215700001400228700001400242700001200256700001100268700001100279700001300290700001400303700001300317700001200330700001500342700001500357700001600372700001300388700001700401700001700418245007800435856009900513300000900612490000700621520265200628022001403280 2024 d c02/20241 aChiphwanya J1 aMkwanda S1 aKabuluzi S1 aMzilahowa T1 aNgwira B1 aMatipula D1 aChaponda L1 aNdhlova P1 aKatchika P1 aChirambo C1 aMoses P1 aKumala J1 aChiumia M1 aBarrett C1 aBetts H1 aFahy J1 aPolo M1 aReimer L1 aStanton M1 aThomas B1 aFreer S1 aMolyneux D1 aBockarie M1 aMackenzie C1 aTaylor M1 aMartindale S1 aKelly-Hope L00aElimination of lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem in Malawi. uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011957&type=printable a1-220 v183 a
Background: Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a parasitic disease transmitted by mosquitoes, causing severe pain, disfiguring, and disabling clinical conditions such as lymphoedema and hydrocoele. LF is a global public health problem affecting 72 countries, primarily in Africa and Asia. Since 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) has led the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) to support all endemic regions. This paper focuses on the achievements of the Malawi LF Elimination Programme between 2000 and 2020 to eliminate LF as a public health problem, making it the second sub-Saharan country to receive validation from the WHO.
Methodology/Principal Findings: The Malawi LF Programme addressed the widespread prevalence of LF infection and disease across the country, using the recommended WHO GPELF strategies and operational research initiatives in collaboration with key national and international partners. First, to stop the spread of infection (i.e., interrupt transmission) and reduce the circulating filarial antigen prevalence from as high as 74.4% to below the critical threshold of 1-2% prevalence, mass drug administration (MDA) using a two-drug regime was implemented at high coverage rates (>65%) of the total population, with supplementary interventions from other programmes (e.g., malaria vector control). The decline in prevalence was monitored and confirmed over time using several impact assessment and post-treatment surveillance tools including the standard sentinel site, spot check, and transmission assessment surveys and alternative integrated, hotspot, and easy-access group surveys. Second, to alleviate suffering of the affected populations (i.e., control morbidity) the morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) package of care was implemented. Specifically, clinical case estimates were obtained via house-to-house patient searching activities; health personnel and patients were trained in self-care protocols for lymphoedema and/or referrals to hospitals for hydrocoele surgery; and the readiness and quality of treatment and services were assessed with new survey tools.
Conclusions: Malawi's elimination of LF will ensure that future generations are not infected and suffer from the disfiguring and disabling disease. However, it will be critical that the Malawi LF Elimination programme remains vigilant, focussing on post-elimination surveillance and MMDP implementation and integration into routine health systems to support long-term sustainability and ongoing success.
a1935-2735