03794nas a2200313   4500000000100000008004100001260004400042653003400086653001200120653001400132653003400146653002200180653003900202653002900241653001000270100001300280700001700293700001500310700001300325700001800338700001400356700001700370245016600387856010000553300000900653490000600662520279800668022001403466       2023                            d  bSpringer Science and Business Media LLC10aComputer Science Applications10aHistory10aEducation10aParticipatory action research10aRapid ethnography10aNeglected tropical diseases (NTDs)10aMass drug administration10aBenin1 aMeans AR1 aSambiéni NE1 aAvokpaho E1 aMonra AB1 aKpatinvoh FAE1 aBardosh K1 aIbikounlé M00aRapid ethnography and participatory techniques increase onchocerciasis mass drug administration treatment coverage in Benin: a difference-in-differences analysis  uhttps://implementationsciencecomms.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43058-023-00423-5.pdf  a1-170 v43 a<p><strong>Background:</strong> Onchocerciasis, a neglected tropical disease (NTD) that causes blindness, is controlled via mass drug administration (MDA) where entire endemic communities are targeted with preventative chemotherapeutic treatment. However, in many settings, MDA coverage remains low. The purpose of this project was to determine if engaging communities in the development of implementation strategies improves MDA coverage.</p>

<p><strong>Methods:</strong> This study took place in an intervention and a control commune in Benin, West Africa. We conducted rapid ethnography in each commune to learn about community member perceptions of onchocerciasis, MDA, and opportunities to increase MDA coverage. Findings were shared with key stakeholders and a structured nominal group technique was used to derive implementation strategies most likely to increase treatment coverage. The implementation strategies were delivered prior to and during onchocerciasis MDA. We conducted a coverage survey within 2&nbsp;weeks of MDA to determine treatment coverage in each commune. A difference-in-differences design was used to determine if the implementation package effectively increased coverage. A dissemination meeting was held with the NTD program and partners to share findings and determine the perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing rapid ethnography as part of routine program improvement.</p>

<p><strong>Results:</strong> During rapid ethnography, key barriers to MDA participation included trust in community drug distributors, poor penetration of MDA programs in rural or geographically isolated areas, and low demand for MDA among specific sub-populations driven by religious or socio-cultural beliefs. Stakeholders developed a five-component implementation strategy package, including making drug distributor trainings dynamic, redesigning distributor job aids, tailoring community sensitization messages, formalizing supervision, and preparing local champions. After implementing the strategy package, MDA coverage increased by 13% (95% CI: 11.0–15.9%) in the intervention commune relative to the control commune. Ministry of Health and implementing partners found the approach to be largely acceptable and appropriate; however, there was mixed feedback regarding the feasibility of future implementation of rapid ethnography.</p>

<p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Implementation research conducted in Benin, and indeed throughout sub-Saharan Africa, is often implemented in a top-down manner, with both implementation determinants and strategies derived in the global North. This project demonstrates the importance of participatory action research involving community members and implementers to optimize program delivery.</p>
  a2662-2211