03190nas a2200349   4500000000100000008004100001260003700042653002400079653005700103100001200160700001700172700001300189700001300202700001600215700001400231700001300245700001600258700001200274700001200286700001300298700001200311700001300323700001500336700001600351700001000367245012000377856009900497300001300596490000700609520221000616022001402826       2021                            d  bPublic Library of Science (PLoS)10aInfectious Diseases10aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health1 aMcKay S1 aShu’aibu J1 aCissé A1 aKnight A1 aAbdullahi F1 aIbrahim A1 aMadaki S1 aGenovezos C1 aMcCoy K1 aDowns P1 aKabore A1 aAdamu H1 aGobir IB1 aChaitkin M1 aStandley CJ1 aWu JT00aSafely resuming neglected tropical disease control activities during COVID-19: Perspectives from Nigeria and Guinea  uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009904&type=printable  ae00099040 v153 a<p>Since its early spread in early 2020, the disease caused by the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused mass disruptions to health services. These have included interruptions to programs that aimed to prevent, control, and eliminate neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) released interim guidelines recommending the temporary cessation of mass drug administration (MDA), community-based surveys, and case detection, while encouraging continuation of morbidity management and vector control where possible. Over the course of the following months, national programs and implementing partners contributed to COVID-19 response efforts, while also beginning to plan for resumption of NTD control activities. To understand the challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for maximizing continuity of disease control during public health emergencies, we sought perspectives from Nigeria and Guinea on the process of restarting NTD control efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through semistructured interviews with individuals involved with NTD control at the local and national levels, we identified key themes and common perspectives between the 2 countries, as well as observations that were specific to each. Overall, interviewees stressed the challenges posed by COVID-19 interruptions, particularly with respect to delays to activities and related knock-on impacts, such as drug expiry and prolonged elimination timelines, as well as concerns related to funding. However, respondents in both countries also highlighted the benefits of a formal risk assessment approach, particularly in terms of encouraging information sharing and increasing coordination and advocacy. Recommendations included ensuring greater availability of historical data to allow better monitoring of how future emergencies affect NTD control progress; continuing to use risk assessment approaches in the future; and identifying mechanisms for sharing lessons learned and innovations between countries as a means of advancing postpandemic health systems and disease control capacity strengthening.</p>
  a1935-2735