03424nas a2200301 4500000000100000008004100001260003700042653005700079653002400136100001800160700001100178700001800189700001300207700001200220700002000232700001100252700001300263700001400276700001400290700001900304700001400323245012200337856009900459300001300558490000700571520253000578022001403108 2021 d bPublic Library of Science (PLoS)10aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health10aInfectious Diseases1 aRubenstein BL1 aRoy SL1 aUnterwegner K1 aYerian S1 aWeiss A1 aZirimwabagabo H1 aChop E1 aRomero M1 aOuakou PT1 aMoundai T1 aGuagliardo SAJ1 aNgondi JM00aCommunity-based Guinea worm surveillance in Chad: Evaluating a system at the intersection of human and animal disease uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0009285&type=printable ae00092850 v153 a
Background
Guinea worm is a debilitating parasitic infection targeted for eradication. Annual human cases have dropped from approximately 3,500,000 in 1986 to 54 in 2019. Recent identification of canine cases in Chad threatens progress, and therefore detection, prevention, and containment of canine cases is a priority. We investigated associations between disease knowledge, community engagement, and canine cases in Chad to identify opportunities to improve active surveillance.
Methods
We surveyed 627 respondents (villagers, local leaders, community volunteers, and supervisors) across 45 villages under active surveillance. Descriptive statistics were analyzed by respondent category. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess the effects of volunteer visit frequency on villager knowledge.
Results
Knowledge increased with respondents’ associations with the Guinea worm program. Household visit frequency by community volunteers was uneven: 53.0% of villagers reported visits at least twice weekly and 21.4% of villagers reported never being visited. Villagers visited by a volunteer at least twice weekly had better knowledge of Guinea worm symptoms (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.04–2.79) and could name more prevention strategies (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.32–3.15) than villagers visited less frequently. The primary motivation to report was to facilitate care-seeking for people with Guinea worm. Knowledge of animal “containment” to prevent contamination of water, knowledge of rewards for reporting animal cases, and ability to name any reasons to report Guinea worm were each positively correlated with village canine case counts.
Conclusions
Community volunteers play crucial roles in educating their neighbors about Guinea worm and facilitating surveillance. Additional training and more attentive management of volunteers and supervisors could increase visit frequency and further amplify their impact. Emphasizing links between animal and human cases, the importance of animal containment, and animal rewards might improve surveillance and canine case detection. The surveillance system should be evaluated routinely to expand generalizability of data and monitor changes over time.
a1935-2735