02469nas a2200445 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001500055653001000070653002100080653002400101653002400125653001000149653002100159653001800180653003800198653001100236653001700247653001100264653001000275653002800285653000900313653001600322653001700338653003200355653003000387653002000417653002100437653001000458100001200468700001000480700001200490700001500502700001300517245008600530300000900616490000700625520137700632022001402009 2006 d c2006 Jan10aAdolescent10aAdult10aAge Distribution10aAgglutination Tests10aAntigens, Protozoan10aChild10aChild, Preschool10aDisinfectants10aEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay10aFemale10aFormaldehyde10aHumans10aIndia10aLeishmaniasis, Visceral10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aRural Health10aSensitivity and Specificity10aSeroepidemiologic Studies10aSerologic Tests10aSex Distribution10awater1 aKumar R1 aPai K1 aKumar P1 aPandey H P1 aSundar S00aSero-epidemiological study of kala-azar in a village of Varanasi district, India. a41-80 v113 a

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate five kala-azar serological tests for field use.

METHOD: Serological survey in Pandit Ka Purva village in Varanasi district, India, using Sia water test, aldehyde test, direct agglutination test (DAT), micro-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and dot-ELISA.

RESULTS: The total population of the village was 518, 67 of whom showed typical clinical and parasitological features of kala-azar, including seven who died. The age distribution of kala-azar cases showed significant differences, being highest among the 45-54-year age group. The disease was more prevalent among males. Serum samples were collected from 498 persons (96% of total population) including 67 kala-azar cases and 40 disease controls (malaria, TB, leprosy, typhoid). Ten 10 serum samples from healthy controls living in endemic area were also collected. The test sensitivities were: Sia water test, 85.0%; aldehyde test, 62.7%; DAT, 94.0%; micro-ELISA, 91.0% and dot-ELISA, 97.0%. The test specificities were: Sia water test 92.5%, aldehyde test, 93.2%, DAT, 96.7; micro-ELISA, 97.6% and dot-ELISA, 98.4%.

CONCLUSION: The dot-ELISA is highly sensitive and specific, cheap, and easy to interpret with the naked eye, making it a powerful screening test for the surveillance and diagnosis of Indian kala-azar at field level.

 a1360-2276