02398nas a2200253 4500000000100000008004100001260002800042653002000070653001900090653003900109653001100148653001600159653002100175653001100196100001100207700001200218700001300230700001400243245011200257856005700369300001200426490000600438520170000444 2017 d bBMJ Specialist Journals10aRiver blindness10aonchocerciasis10aNeglected tropical diseases (NTDs)10aImpact10aElimination10aEconomic aspects10aAfrica1 aKim YE1 aStolk W1 aTanner M1 aTediosi F00aModelling the health and economic impacts of the elimination of river blindness (onchocerciasis) in Africa. uhttp://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/2/2/e000158.full.pdf ae0001580 v23 a

Background
Onchocerciasis (river blindness) is endemic mostly in remote and rural areas in sub-Saharan Africa. The treatment goal for onchocerciasis has shifted from control to elimination in Africa. For investment decisions, national and global policymakers need evidence on benefits, costs and risks of elimination initiatives.

Methods
We estimated the health benefits using a dynamical transmission model, and the needs for health workforce and outpatient services for elimination strategies in comparison to a control mode. We then estimated the associated costs to both health systems and households and the potential economic impacts in terms of income gains.

Results
The elimination of onchocerciasis in Africa would avert 4.3 million–5.6 million disability-adjusted life years over 2013–2045 when compared with staying in the control mode, and also reduce the required number of community volunteers by 45–53% and community health workers by 56–60%. The elimination of onchocerciasis in Africa when compared with the control mode is predicted to save outpatient service costs by $37.2 million–$39.9 million and out-of-pocket payments by $25.5 million–$26.9 million over 2013–2045, and generate economic benefits up to $5.9 billion–$6.4 billion in terms of income gains.

Discussion
The elimination of onchocerciasis in Africa would lead to substantial health and economic benefits, reducing the needs for health workforce and outpatient services. To realise these benefits, the support and collaboration of community, national and global policymakers would be needed to sustain the elimination strategies.