03351nas a2200325 4500000000100000008004100001260003700042653003100079100002200110700001200132700002300144700001400167700001200181700001200193700001300205700001500218700001700233700001400250700001100264700001400275700002100289700001300310700001400323245013900337856009900476300001300575490000700588520241600595022001403011 2025 d bPublic Library of Science (PLoS)10aRDT, rapid diagnostic test1 aArdiles-Ruesjas S1 aLesmo V1 aGonzález-Romero V1 aCubilla Z1 aChena L1 aHuber C1 aRivas MJ1 aSaldaña P1 aCarrascosa A1 aMéndez S1 aSanz S1 aBecker SL1 aAlonso-Padilla J1 aLosada I1 aFraga DBM00aPrevalence and diagnostic accuracy of different diagnostic tests for Chagas disease in an indigenous community of the Paraguayan Chaco uhttps://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012861&type=printable ae00128610 v193 a
Introduction Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), poses a major health challenge in Paraguay, especially in the resource-limited Chaco region. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are valuable tools to enhance diagnostic access. This study evaluates CD prevalence and risk factors in an indigenous community in the Paraguayan Chaco and validates the national RDT-based diagnostic algorithm for resource-limited settings against the recommended standard algorithm, which relies solely on conventional serological tests.
Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Casanillo, Presidente Hayes, Paraguay. In July 2023, a two-week field campaign was executed using a non-probability convenience sampling method targeting individuals aged over 9 months. Screening involved a single RDT, with positives confirmed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Algorithm accuracy was validated externally at the National Reference Laboratory of Paraguay against the standard algorithm, which, in this study, included an ELISA and Hemagglutination test. Discordant cases were resolved with a second ELISA or Immunofluorescence. Results The study involved 999 participants, with a median age of 26 years (IQR 12-45), and 51.1% were female. The RDT-based diagnostic algorithm showed 97.1% agreement (κ = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.90–0.98) with the standard algorithm. The RDT alone had 96.0% agreement (κ = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.87–0.96), while the confirmatory ELISA had 94.3% agreement (κ = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.83–0.93). The algorithm’s sensitivity/specificity (95%CI) were 94.6% (89.2–97.8)/98.6% (96.1–99.7), with the RDT at 94.6% (89.2–97.8)/96.8% (93.6–98.7) and the ELISA at 96.9% (92.3–99.2)/92.7% (88.5–95.8). T.cruzi infection seroprevalence was 12.6% (95%CI: 9.56–16.52). Age, Sanapaná ethnicity, and awareness of CD vectors were significantly associated with infection odds. No significant associations were found with other typical CD risk factors, clinical history, or health habits. Conclusion The study underscores the high burden of T. cruzi infection in indigenous communities in the Paraguayan Chaco, urging immediate interventions for improved diagnosis and treatment. The combination of RDTs with conventional serology for diagnostic screening in resource-constrained settings proved useful, and its further use is encouraged.
a1935-2735