@article{101294, keywords = {Diagnostic test, Yaws, Case detection}, author = {Handley BL and Gonzalez-Beiras C and Tchatchouang S and Hugues KA and Basing LA and Sylla A and Kouamé-Sina MS and Amanor I and Ndzomo P and Aloumba A and Bakheit M and Müller C and Borst N and Landmann E and Gmoser H and Härpfer T and Becherer L and Lüert S and Frischmann S and Burl S and Tabah EN and Crucitti T and Kouadio AT and Arhinful DK and Awondo P and Kakou SN and Eyangoh S and Addo KK and Knauf S and Mitjà O and Harding-Esch EM and Marks M}, title = {A loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for yaws: a multi-country diagnostic accuracy evaluation}, abstract = {

Background: To meet the WHO target of eradicating yaws by 2030, highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tools are needed. A multiplex Treponema pallidumHaemophilus ducreyi loop-mediated isothermal amplification (TPHD-LAMP) test holds promise as a near-patient diagnostic tool for yaws and H ducreyi. We conducted a prospective evaluation in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, and the Republic of the Congo to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the TPHD-LAMP test, as well as to assess its acceptability, feasibility, and cost.

Methods: Active case searching within schools and communities was used to locate participants with clinically suspicious laws-like lesions. Individuals with serologically confirmed active yaws provided paired lesion swabs between March, 2021, and April, 2023. For each participant, one swab was tested with the TPHD-LAMP at a local district laboratory and the other with reference quantitative PCR (qPCR) tests conducted at national reference laboratories. The primary outcome was TPHD-LAMP test sensitivity and specificity compared with qPCR. Laboratory technicians were interviewed using a multiple-choice survey to gauge acceptability and feasibility of the TPHD-LAMP test. Costs of each test were calculated.

Findings: Of 3085 individuals with at least one suspected yaws lesion, 531 (17%) were serologically confirmed. We enrolled 493 participants with seropositive yaws and a further 32 with negative serology. The sensitivity of the TPHD-LAMP test for detecting T pallidum was 63% (95% CI 56–70) and the specificity was 66% (95% CI 61–71). Sensitivity and specificity for T pallidum improved to 73% (63–82; p=0·0065) and 75% (68–80; p=0·0003), respectively, in H ducreyi-negative samples. Interviews highlighted challenges in user-friendliness and practicality of the TPHD-LAMP test. The cost of the test per sample was one third of that of qPCR, although the TPHD-LAMP test entailed higher costs to establish the assay.

Interpretation: This was the first multi-country diagnostic evaluation of a molecular test for yaws. The TPHD-LAMP testing, in its current form, falls short of the WHO target product profile criteria for yaws diagnostics. These findings highlight the importance of assessing new diagnostics in real-world conditions to ensure their suitability for programmatic use.

}, year = {2024}, journal = {The Lancet Global Health}, volume = {12}, pages = {e1891-e1898}, publisher = {Elsevier BV}, issn = {2214-109X}, url = {https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2214-109X%2824%2900324-3}, doi = {10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00324-3}, language = {ENG}, }