@article{100459,
  keywords = {Decolonisation, Inclusivity, Engagement, Epistemic justice, Ethical communication},
  author = {Reed MS and Merkle BG and Cook EJ and Hafferty C and Hejnowicz AP and Holliman R and Marder ID and Pool U and Raymond CM and Wallen KE and Whyte D and Ballesteros M and Bhanbhro S and Borota S and Brennan ML and Carmen E and Conway EA and Everett R and Armstrong-Gibbs F and Jensen E and Koren G and Lockett J and Obani P and O’Connor S and Prange L and Mason J and Robinson S and Shukla P and Tarrant A and Marchetti A and Stroobant M},
  title = {Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world},
  abstract = {<p>Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.</p>
},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Sustainability Science},
  volume = {19},
  pages = {1481-1490},
  publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
  issn = {1862-4065, 1862-4057},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4.pdf},
  doi = {10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4},
  language = {ENG},
}